NickName wrote:
After 3 rounds to weed out the terribly unlucky, lesser skilled, or good players who brought subpar squads, there's not a lot left to decide games.
For the most part, this is completely true. While I would love qualifyers, I can live with it as is, especially if we do it as a two day event this year and be perfectly happy about it (2nd day only for top
.
My two loses, one was to Dr. Divot, which basically could have gone either way with some inits, or side roll changed. But there was no need for 3 games for that one, we were both equally skilled.
In my finals game, I absolutely would have loved to have had 2 more chances. Heck, I lost by one point on his map, after losing set up roll, and Han missed a ton of shots. Give me two more games in that one, and I likely win both.
With that said, I was more than happy to have it decided by one game. Just as I lost due to some untimely factors, there is no guarantee that I win that game 2 more times either. I am perfectly happy with a one game deal.
And certainly, there were other games I had that could have gone another way given a 3 game deal that I won, so I am sure it all pretty much equals out. Perhaps the finals could be a best of 3, but even then, that doesnt really change a whole lot.